It appears that, just like misery, an investigation into possible discriminatory ad practices facilitated by a tech giant loves company.
Following the March 28 revelation that the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has filed charges against Facebook for allegedly violating the Fair Housing Act, the Washington Postnow reports that Google and Twitter are under investigation by the same agency. And for more or less the same thing.
SEE ALSO: Facebook belatedly makes it harder to run some discriminatory adsIt turns out that HUD is looking into the super specific ad-targeting features offered by the companies in an effort to determine if they facilitate housing discrimination. An advertising platform that, say, allows the owner of an apartment complex to purposefully exclude certain groups — such as people of color — from seeing new listings would be in violation of the law.
Facebook settled a lawsuit about this very unfortunate feature of its site earlier this month, but that apparently wasn't enough to remove it from HUD's sights.
“Even as we confront new technologies, the fair housing laws enacted over half a century ago remain clear—discrimination in housing-related advertising is against the law," HUD general counsel Paul Compton said in a March 28 press release. "Just because a process to deliver advertising is opaque and complex doesn’t mean that it exempts Facebook and others from our scrutiny and the law of the land."
Notice the "and others" bit of that statement? Yeah, so did we.
According to the Post, HUD told Twitter and Google last year that it was looking into similar violations at their respective companies. Unsurprisingly, Twitter is not stoked to be on the receiving end of such an investigation.
"Twitter doesn't allow discriminatory advertising on our platform," a Twitter spokesperson told Mashable over email. "Someone using Twitter to advertise agrees to comply with the law and not use our services for illegal activities. Discrimination in housing and employment is against the law and against our rules."
Likewise, Google made it abundantly clear in a statement to Mashable that it is not down with enabling or facilitating illegal discrimination.
“We’ve had policies in place for many years that prohibit targeting ads on the basis of sensitive categories like race, ethnicity, religious beliefs, disability status, negative financial standing, etc," a spokesperson wrote via email. "Our policies are designed to protect users and ensure that advertisers are using our platforms in a responsible manner."
Yes, policies designed to protect users are great! It's just that sometimes, as Facebook, Google, and Twitter repeatedly remind us, policies alone don't mean much when divorced from the actual product being offered. Especially if the product in question straight up helps bad actors break the law.
Copyright © 2023 Powered by
Twitter and Google under scrutiny for housing discrimination-啜英咀华网
sitemap
文章
8
浏览
7559
获赞
64454
UK government ditches 'porn block'. What happens now?
The UK government has shelved its controversial "porn block", which would have introduced legislatioHow to change language on Facebook
Immersing yourself in a new language is a great way to force yourself to learn it. One way you can dHow to share a video clip in Slack
Want to be able to record a video of yourself and share it in Slack? Neither do I! But we're gonna sTaylor Swift TikTok is the perfect place for fans new and old
My TikTok For You Page is all Taylor Swift.Now, this is by design. The all-knowing TikTok algorithmNo Mercy: SEC charges rapper T.I. over cryptocurrency scam
It would seem T.I. left a paper trail. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on Friday announAmazon completely redesigns Prime Video interface
Amazon’s got a big fall season coming up, so the Prime Video app is getting overhauled ahead oThere are new tools for Google Password Manager
If you're terrible at making your passwords the correct strength, and then even worse at rememberingHow to use Tinder's new Explore feature
Tinder just added an Explore pageto its app, part of an attempt to be more Gen Z-friendly that incluDid Trump forget about his TikTok ban? TikTok would like to know.
President Trump has been very busy with his re-election campaign and, of late, dubious legal challenHow to pre
Everyone's favorite earbuds got a few fresh upgrades — and you can now pre-order them throughCNN has abandoned its NFT project, and investors are not happy
Need more proof that the NFT craze has died down? CNN has given up on Vault, the company's NFT markeTwilio hack results in security issue for 1,900 Signal users
On Monday, Signal, often viewed as the most secure messaging app, shared that a security breach of iMom’s mug collection finally gets the display it deserves, and the internet is in love
If you think that love or chivalry are dead, you are sorely mistaken. But you gotta remember to persThe 'IWasGoingToQuitTwitterBut' hashtag is going viral on Twitter
Back in April when Elon Musk said he was buying Twitter, an intense debate kicked off online over whInstagram's latest feature: scheduled posts
Instagramis testing a new featureagain. But this one actually seems pretty nice.A spokesperson for M